How Omega Built Space, Breitling Hijacked the Moment, & IWC is Chasing the Future
At Watches and Wonders in Geneva a few weeks ago, my first stop was IWC Schaffhausen, a company I have long admired as the Mark XVII was my go-to for most of a decade while overseas at CIA. As I neared the packed booth, the motif was clear: futuristic space station. The brand likely spent millions of dollars constructing a modern space station vibe, complete with a (real) acrobat floating over a stage.
As I greeted a friend, who runs IWC’s unit watch program, I couldn't help but think to myself: “Bad time to launch a space watch.”

IWC was all in on space at Watches and Wonders.
Breitling - A Marketing Master Class
In the days leading up to the trade show, Breitling masterfully launched its new Navitimer B02 Chronograph 41 Cosmonaute Artemis II into the (literal) stratosphere, leveraging wrist shots from NASA astronauts aboard Artemis II before officially unveiling the watch on the eve of Watches and Wonders.
In an industry increasingly reliant on influencers and manufactured hype, Breitling attached its messaging to something far more compelling: mankind’s return to deep-space exploration. By the time IWC opened its booth, the conversation around watches in space already belonged to Breitling. (Note, Breitling didn’t even attend Watches and Wonders, but set up at the Four Seasons on the lake).
But after visiting IWC, I learned that the brand was betting on the future, partnering with commercial space company Vast, which plans to launch its own space station with a series of SpaceX missions. Through the partnership, IWC plans to develop purpose-built watches for the next era of private human spaceflight. I couldn’t help but reflect, does any one brand really own space marketing?

Mission Commander Reid Wiseman prominently wore the new Breitling Cosmonaute on Artemis II.
Marketing the Final Frontier
For watch brands, space travel remains one of the most powerful and proven marketing vehicles because it combines engineering, national pride, and our obsession with exploration into a narrative far more compelling than traditional luxury advertising.
More importantly, watches in space are still, at least to some extent, actual tools. Whether tracking mission elapsed time, coordinating across multiple time zones, or serving as analog backups, watches continue to play a functional role in human spaceflight. The battle for credibility in this domain was on full display throughout Watches and Wonders.
W.O.E. Bias - Omega is the Leader
As a (former) intelligence officer, I always try to identify my own biases. In my mind, the clear historic and present-day leader in space watches is Omega. From the Speedmaster’s role in Apollo and its status as the first watch worn on the Moon, to the modern X-33 quietly serving as standard issue equipment for NASA astronauts, Omega’s connection to spaceflight is rooted in decades of real history. A visit to the brand’s museum in Biel only reinforces this reality and highlights the marketing machine behind it, feeling less like a watch museum and more like a shrine to the Space Race (and Bond).

Astronaut Buzz Aldrin wearing a Speedmaster on Apollo 11. (Photo Credit: NASA)
That said, dozens of watch brands can claim some credibility in space flight, from Breitling and its association with Scott Carpenter, to Seiko, Sinn, Rolex, and even obscure references from the Cold War. The reality is that astronauts have always worn a wide range of watches, often privately purchased (insert Jonny Kim). Last year, Tudor even released a documentary on Tudor Submariners issued to US Navy frogmen during Apollo astronaut recovery operations, proving that space marketing doesn’t end at the atmosphere.

The astronauts of Artemis II wore Breitling and Omega watches, often at the same time. (Photo Credit: NASA)
Breitling’s Artemis II Marketing Coup
If Omega owns the institutional legacy of spaceflight, then Breitling executed one of the smartest modern watch marketing campaigns in recent memory. By quietly placing its unreleased Navitimer Cosmonaute Artemis II on the wrists of astronauts during mankind’s return to deep space, Breitling generated organic intrigue before formally unveiling the watch days before Watches and Wonders. The timing couldn’t have been better.
Much of the buzz came through the watch community itself, with accounts like @niccoloy and W.O.E. spotting and discussing the watch in mission imagery before any official announcement. We were pawns to the marketing suits in Breitling, and we played into their well-moisturized Swiss hands. Our coverage ultimately became the most-read Dispatch published on W.O.E. this year. The timing may have been partly luck, but it nevertheless amounted to a beautifully executed exercise in modern marketing and a reminder that real exploration is still far more compelling than manufactured influence.

Is IWC’s Space Watch a Marketing Gimmick? Maybe, but Don't Be So Quick
What makes IWC’s new space-focused watch, the Pilot's Venturer Vertical Drive, is that it mirrors a fundamental shift in the realities of space travel itself. For decades, space exploration was dominated by NASA’s government astronauts wearing issued Omegas and the International Space Station, but that era is rapidly changing. With the ISS nearing retirement and companies like SpaceX, Vast, Blue Origin, and others increasingly driving human spaceflight, the future of space looks more commercial than ever.
IWC’s partnership with Vast, a private aerospace company developing commercial space stations intended to succeed the International Space Station, and development of a purpose-built watch for future (civilian) astronauts feels less rooted in Apollo-era nostalgia and more aligned with where the industry is actually headed: privately operated stations, commercial missions, and a new generation of space travelers who may never wear a NASA patch at all.

The new IWC Pilot's Venturer Vertical Drive is a commercial watch intended for an increasingly commercial space travel industry. (Photo Credit: IWC)
The IWC Pilot's Venturer Vertical Drive is futuristic with a rotating bezel system to replace the crown and undeniably expensive at a proposed $28,200, but that may ultimately be beside the point. Much like the early days of the Space Race itself, these watches are less about pure utility and more about optimism, experimentation, and signaling participation in what brands believe is the next frontier of human exploration.
Bremont - Sending a Watch to the Moon?

Bremont’s new space watch, the Supernova Chronograph, is poised to make its lunar debut on a commercially-built rover as part of what can only be called a marketing stunt. (Photo Credit: Bremont)
An honorable mention goes to Bremont, which also debuted a lunar-themed release around Watches and Wonders, attaching the newly unveiled Supernova Chronograph to a rover built by commercial aerospace company Astrolab that is destined for the Moon’s surface. While the effort deserves credit for ambition, it feels more contrived and marketing-driven than the organic astronaut associations leveraged by IWC, Omega, or Breitling. Still, in an era when most brands rely on celebrities and influencers, even a somewhat manufactured connection to real space exploration is arguably a step in the right direction.
Final Thoughts: No One Owns Space
For now, Omega remains the benchmark. No other brand can match the legacy and trust earned through Apollo, the Moon landing, and the continued operational issuance of the X-33 (also used on Artemis II). But Breitling unquestionably won the moment, inserting itself into one of the most culturally significant missions of the decade without relying on a celebrity ambassador or influencer campaign. Meanwhile, IWC appears focused less on nostalgia and more on the future, betting that commercial spaceflight will redefine what a “space watch” even means. It’s tempting to write this off as a gimmick, but space travel is moving fast… and dominance breeds complacency.

The future of space watches is being written as we speak, and it may be more privatized than we would have ever imagined.
As someone who is a self-described cynic of the watch industry, I would argue this kind of marketing is good for our community and the watch industry writ large. Historically, watch brands built themselves alongside explorers, divers, pilots, and astronauts because those people represented the outer edge of human capability and real risk.
Compared to a celebrity wearing a watch on the red carpet of the Met Gala, a watch strapped over a spacesuit aboard a lunar mission simply means more. No one brand truly owns space, and it probably never should. The Moonwatch may always belong to Omega, but the next great space watch story is being written right now, and the future is still uncertain.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider signing up for our weekly free newsletter for further updates HERE.
At Watches of Espionage, all of our content is directly supported by our shop. To learn more about our collection of purpose-built tools designed for our community, click HERE.
The Watches of Espionage Dad Hat

12 comments
interesting commentary on that facet of watch marketing/history/identity! i do wonder about the reactions at IWC to the way breitling swiped the watch-related enthusiasm of the moment that artemis II provided. they must long have had their deal in pocket and planned accordingly, only to see the air get sucked out of where they planned to go: make as cool a watch as you might, i don’t think being a private company’s official space watch has anywhere near the nimbus that the tool of actual research spaceflight has. (no matter how warranted! even if vast’s private/commercial space station ends up seeing way more research than NASA/ESA/etc spaceflight, as you said, there’s an element of ‘means more’ at play. a soldier’s duty has that over a mercenary’s work, a mountaineer has that over a sponsored athlete, and a ‘real’ astronaut has that over a commercial space pilot.)
Over the years we’ve gone from watch companies getting a boost when an astronaut or agency chose to wear their watch to watch companies deciding which watch an astronaut or agency will wear. This comes with a corresponding reduction in coolness. Dr. Kim, who apparently heads into space with a duffel bag full of watches, is the exception. His coolness remains undimmed.
The movement and the mechanics on that IWC is really cool, even if the given “adjusting and winding with gloves on” reasoning is dubious at best. If they put the pilot’s watch dial from the Mark series on it, I would be seriously trying to buy one of those in the future.
Love the article. I don’t understand the marketing play, what’s inspiring someone to buy a $28000 “Space watch” with no Space Legacy? Especially since at a $100 a G Shock can claim to be a “Space Watch”, then there is a Moonswatch that at least is a legit (and authorized) copy of the OG Moon Watch or for less the $1000 you can own the Bulova Lunar Pilot the “other” Moon Watch . Some of these new “Space Watches” feel unauthentic and just a revenue avenue for the Luxury Watch industry. In my opinion what made “Space Watches” alluring to people was that it was probably the only accessible and attainable piece of equipment (a legit tool) someone could purchase with a little bit of saving.
Further proof that Bremont has lost the plot.